<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Advent Day 19 &#8211; Cheatsheets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webdeveloper2.com/2008/12/web-advent-day-19-cheatsheets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webdeveloper2.com/2008/12/web-advent-day-19-cheatsheets/</link>
	<description>A blog about web design and development, tools, techniques, products and relevant news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:42:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://webdeveloper2.com/2008/12/web-advent-day-19-cheatsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdeveloper2.com/?p=636#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;m a jQuery person. I think it very much depends on how much skill you have in Javascript and what you are hoping to achieve. jQuery is very lightweight and I usually use it to avoid having to think about cross-browser compatibility.
If you don&#039;t have any preference, then it&#039;s worth looking at all of them and the extensions available for each one. In fact it&#039;s worth looking even if you do have a preference as sometimes there&#039;s cool stuff that&#039;s right for you but not yet available anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m a jQuery person. I think it very much depends on how much skill you have in Javascript and what you are hoping to achieve. jQuery is very lightweight and I usually use it to avoid having to think about cross-browser compatibility.<br />
If you don&#8217;t have any preference, then it&#8217;s worth looking at all of them and the extensions available for each one. In fact it&#8217;s worth looking even if you do have a preference as sometimes there&#8217;s cool stuff that&#8217;s right for you but not yet available anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software development Company</title>
		<link>http://webdeveloper2.com/2008/12/web-advent-day-19-cheatsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Software development Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdeveloper2.com/?p=636#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Among the listed javascript libraries which do you recommend ? 

# JQuery 1.2
# mootools 1.2
# Prototype 1.5.0
# Scriptaculous Combination Effects 

Or in other words which library contains the MOST functions ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the listed javascript libraries which do you recommend ? </p>
<p># JQuery 1.2<br />
# mootools 1.2<br />
# Prototype 1.5.0<br />
# Scriptaculous Combination Effects </p>
<p>Or in other words which library contains the MOST functions ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
